The Art and Science of 360˚ Feedback Jossey-Bass-Pfeiffer: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2009. Ten reasons why you should be using 360-degree feedback. Perceptions or reality: Is multi-perspective measurement a means to an end? Hum. Development and validation of plain English interpretations of the seven elements of the risk management process. Thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 2015. Optimising Risk Management Team Processes. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Secondly, that a collectively-optimised team (formed using the Riskometric) can perform a risk assessment exercise better than marginally- or sub-optimised teams. Firstly, that individuals’ RISKometric results are comparable with their performance in a risk scenario exercise so, providing validity for the tool.
In future research, we test assumptions through a further two studies.
Initial results gained from using the tool suggest it is able to discriminate the competence of participants, in each of the elements of risk management, through the opinions of self and others.
Results showed that a significant positive relationship existed between the feedback given by peers and downline colleagues. The RISKometric was tested using 26 participants. This tool, termed the RISKometric, incorporated a 360° performance review method whereby peers upline and downline colleagues and the individual themselves gave competence ratings. This study aimed to develop a tool to assess the competence of individuals in different elements of the risk management process and then review its reliability. Often the risk management process is undertaken by a single person, or by teams without a facilitator and without regard to the participants’ levels of competency in the risk management process. Ineffective and inefficient workforce involvement can negatively impact risk management practice for work health and safety (WHS) issues.
0 kommentar(er)
